Purchasing Cooperatives

Thoughts and strategies for running a purchasing cooperative or buying group

Members Can’t Beat Amazon; Groups Can (Part 3 of 3)

This is part three of a three part series. Part one outlined Amazon Business’s platform model and how the traditional strategies of member-distributors will not be competitive. Part two proposed a buying group-based strategy to compete through the creation of a new marketplace owned jointly by the membership. In part three, below, I outline more specific features of a marketplace allowing you to compete against Amazon.

Recreating Amazon’s marketplace is a sure route to failure. Sure, there are elements worth adopting – powerful search, user reviews, simple check out procedures, etc. – but rather than emulating Amazon, focus on your member-distributor’s strengths and Amazon’s weaknesses.

Amazon thrives in two areas – product information and data collection. While Amazon knows their customers, they do not know their customer’s business. Amazon doesn’t have the same level of expertise as your members do. Amazon doesn’t have your reputation and relationships within the marketplace.

A group-driven marketplace should include the following features:

1.     B2C User Experience

Millennials will make up the majority of marketplace users, and they want their experience to be identical to their B2C shopping experience. An intuitive and user-friendly experience is a must. Personalization and predictive ordering are a must.

2.     Helpful Product Content

The best way to attract more web traffic is to add more content and more helpful guidance to every product on your site. Create a blog where you discuss business topics of real concern to the people who use your products.

3.     Offer Unique Products

Offer products that Amazon does not. This could be as simple as bundling a number of related products into a kit with a lower total price, or it could mean creating private label versions of existing high margin products.

4.     Strong Customer Service

Customer service in the B2B world means solving problems. Dedicate knowledgeable sales reps who know their buyers and products to your site. Provide human touch points. Provide multi-location logistics. Strong customer service should not be anything new for your members – figure out how you can apply what your members already do to the web. Amazon cannot compete with a human experience.

5.     Build a Hybrid Marketplace

B2B customers will always require an experience that includes both full service and online capabilities. Build a bridge between the online and offline worlds.

6.     Maximize Your Data

Route your eCommerce data into a good business intelligence tool that will help you understand what is working and what does not.

7.     Think About the Full Customer Experience

B2B eCommerce is not all about ordering products. How do your customers create claims? How do they deal with payment issues? Where do they discuss terms? Are they eligible for rebates? Where can they receive training? Are there product shows that they can attend? Make sure your marketplace makes the full customer experience a rich one.

The key to competing against Amazon is to bring the natural strengths of your member-distributors to the online world. A central group, owned by the members, can provide the leadership, guidance, and operational staff to creating a marketplace where members can compete on a level playing field.

Members Can’t Beat Amazon; Groups Can (Part 2 of 3)

This is part two of a three part series. Part one outlined Amazon Business’s platform model and how the traditional strategies of member-distributors will not be competitive. In part two, below, I outline a buying group-based strategy to compete.

The B2B ecommerce stakes are high. Global B2B ecommerce sales are predicted to reach $3 trillion by 2024. Independent distributors, largely, have come late to the game, and their dual strategies of digital innovation and acquisitions are failing against the platform business model used by Amazon and others.

As described in part one of this article, the key to competing with Amazon is understanding their business model. Amazon’s platform allows Amazon to focus on selling a relatively small number of high volume items while leaving the rest to other suppliers on their platform. This model creates unprecedented depth to their catalogue of products while driving higher margins.

Individual distributors cannot compete with Amazon’s catalogue depth or create their own platform.

This is where purchasing co-operatives can step in.

Or, more specifically, sales co-operatives.

The idea of a sales co-operative is to take the notion of “one member, one vote” from the purchasing realm and apply it to selling online. Distributors in various industries could join together in a jointly funded initiative that can beat Amazon at the B2B game. Independents could leverage their strengths – services, customer relations, and product knowledge – in a way that Amazon could not.

Amazon is a generalist B2B marketplace. Given the size and fragmentation within B2B distribution industries, an opportunity exists for vertical-specific marketplaces. Groups – whether purchasing co-ops, buying groups, or sales co-ops – can take Amazon’s recipe for a marketplace and turn it to their members’ advantage.

It’s important to remember that a marketplace is not just a piece of technology. A marketplace is a business model. It creates value by bringing together distributors and consumers. Scale comes from growing an external network.

Adapting the purchasing co-operative model to build a niche marketplace would allow individual distributors to leverage their numbers and achieve an economy of scale necessary in the creation of a national marketplace. The sales co-operative could provide the technology and the staff to maintain the platform. It could gather the product information needed to populate the marketplace. It could drive the high standards necessary for such a marketplace to be competitive.

Most importantly, individual distributors could still compete against each other based on their own strengths, but on a level playing field.

Members Can’t Beat Amazon; Groups Can (Part 1 of 3)

Independent member-distributors will not be able to beat Amazon in B2B e-commerce. There, I said it. Sure, they may be able to compete short term against Amazon, Wal-Mart, Wish, Houzz, or any of the other giant marketplaces vying to dominate the playing field, but they can’t win this battle alone in the long run.

It shouldn’t surprise you that B2B e-commerce is on the rise. According to research data from Forrester, e-commerce will make up about $780 billion in B2B sales – about 9% of all B2B sales – in 2019. They are predicted to reach $3 trillion globally by 2024.

This trend is as much of a threat as it is an opportunity for your member-distributors.

The most disruptive trends in the B2B environment of the last three years have all been related to the rise of B2B eCommerce:

  • Digital Shift. Competitors and customers have moved online, and customer expectations have evolved
  • Amazon and other Marketplaces. These marketplaces want your data and your customers
  • Disintermediation. Manufacturers and customers are increasingly trying to remove the middleman

In general, member-distributors, if they have responded at all, have responded with two strategies – digital innovation and mergers and acquisitions. Unfortunately, neither of these strategies can work without a true understanding of Amazon’s B2B marketplace and its threat to the independent.

First, some history. Amazon’s original foray into B2B distribution did not look like it does today. In 2012, their first attempt to enter this market took the form of Amazon Supply. Amazon Supply followed a traditional linear business model where Amazon owned all the inventory it sold. This approach ultimately failed because it could not compete on price.

Learning from their mistakes, in 2015 Amazon launched Amazon Business, a true B2B marketplace. Disruption since then has been swift, and distributors have struggled to respond.

Why haven’t independents been able to respond and gain their footing in the digital world?

Member-distributors all too often answer this question with their own fatalistic question: “How can we compete against someone as big and as technologically sophisticated as Amazon?

This question, as well as the strategies of digital innovation and acquisitions, are blind to the biggest reason for Amazon Business’s success. Many distributors have built web- and app-based B2B portals rivaling Amazon in sophistication which have nevertheless been unable to compete with Amazon.

Amazon isn’t winning the B2B war because of their size or their technology. They are winning because of their platform business model.

Amazon Business is a B2B marketplace, or platform, that connects buyers and sellers, taking a commission on every sale. This model has allowed Amazon to grow exponentially since each new producer and consumer increases the value of the marketplace for other users.

Distributors who simply migrate their existing linear business model to the web or who acquire a new location (within the same vertical or an adjacent one) fail to understand the crux of Amazon’s threat.

In part two of this article, I will outline a strategy for buying groups and purchasing co-operatives that would allow their independent member-distributors to successfully compete against Amazon and other platform providers.

Are You Ready for “Group 2.0”? A New Identity for Buying Groups

Your buying group is a technology company, and if it isn’t, it should be.

The hard truth is that, at this very moment, your group and your members are being disrupted. Business disruption is the new normal – it’s a reality that organizations face on a regular basis. The source of this disruption is the rapid advancement of technology and globalization, which allows new business models to be introduced at an ever-increasing rate and with rapidly decreasing costs.

There was a time when the primary role of buying groups was negotiation and administration. Technology was simple – Excel, a small accounting package, and an outsourced web site. Tech was treated as a cost center rather than as a source of competitive advantage.

Imagine Starting Over

Ask yourself, if you were starting a group of independents today and had technology bred into your bones, what would your group look like? Would you focus on negotiating rebates? On operational efficiencies? Or would you emphasize increasing sales, enlarging a customer base, and entering new revenue channels?

While the rest of the business world has gone through a technological upheaval, far too many independents have failed to embrace technology. How many of your members have a strong online presence? How many can sell to and service their customers online? How many have created specific teams for expanding online relationships and sales?

Most importantly, as a group leader, do you see these shortcomings as a downfall or as an opportunity?

Is there a model for groups of independents focused on selling that will disrupt the traditional buying group model? In other articles, I have argued for the creation of “sales cooperatives” that use the underlying principles of purchasing cooperatives but focus on revenue creation.

How would thinking of your group as a technology platform change the way you and your members act?

What if you assumed your members were virtual members rather than physical locations?

What if you embraced technology as your competitive advantage?

These are the types of questions you, your board of directors, and your members should be asking yourselves. “It’s the group’s job to do for it’s members what it’s members can’t do for themselves,” insists Jack Bailey, former president of IBC-USA – a sentiment he, in turn, attributes to Howard Brodsky, co-founder of CCA Global Partners. In today’s age, this means providing guidance and accessibility to technology.

Group 2.0

Just like the phrase “Web 2.0” marked a distinct turning point in how the Internet was used, the phrase “Group 2.0” represents a fundamental shift in thinking about how members think of their buying group. New members, having grown up with Amazon, Spotify, and Facebook will demand a new philosophy.

Bestselling author Josh Linkner insists, “We can no longer rely on the past as a game plan for winning. Deliberate disruption is the only path to sustainable growth and success.”

In other words, disrupt or be disrupted.

What can your buying group learn from Toys R Us?

I’ve been watching the fall of Toys R Us with mixed feelings. In my twenties, I worked for a multi-location independent toy store. Despite doing everything right – competing on service, offering innovative product lines not available elsewhere, and keeping up with technology trends – the stores eventually buckled under competition from the reigning category killer at the time, Toys R Us.

Now the corporate giant Toys R Us, which went into bankruptcy last September, has begun the liquidation process, and 30,000 jobs are at risk. The reasons behind the demise of Toys R Us present an interesting lesson for buying groups.

Why did Toys R Us Fail?

Contrary to first impressions, increased competition from Amazon did not put the nail in the toy chain’s coffin.  Toys R Us still had 15% of the U.S. toy chain market. Yes, Amazon had an effect, like it has on all industries. But Amazon alone didn’t kill the category killer.

Toys R Us suffered from poor financial decisions coupled with an unwillingness to adapt their business model with changes in the industry. Increased competition from Walmart and declining profitability opened the door to a debt-financed takeover by KKR and Bain Capital in 2005.

With any debt-financed takeover, the main strategy is to improve cash flow by cutting costs so that the interest can be paid. In other words, the new ownership team took their focus off the marketplace, making them unaware of key changes taking place.

Rather than wanting toys, kids wanted electronics and apps. Like the rest of us, they craved experiences rather than possessions. The toy chain was now competing against Best Buy, the Apple store, trampoline parks, and laser tag. While they should have been reinvigorating their shopping experience with interactive displays and magical shopping environments (like the LEGO store, for example), their stores remained mundane and unwelcoming.

To make matters worse, declining retail real estate prices crippled the chain’s strategy of selling off key assets to pay off their debt.

Lessons learned

The lesson of Toys R Us is how the wrong financial decisions can doom your members and your group. How changes in the market can doom an old business model, leaving you unable to compete.

To succeed, independents need both the resources and the strategic vision to invest in change, otherwise they will lose relevancy like Toys R Us, Circuit City, and Borders.

This is where your buying group comes in. What kind of strategic leadership are you offering your members? How are you providing cost-effective resources critical to keeping your members current in the marketplace? How do you predict the changes that are going to disrupt your industry? What is your role do you take with financial planning for your members?

Successfully Adopting Electronic Ordering within a Purchasing Cooperative

Purchasing cooperatives struggle with moving from a decentralized or paper-based ordering network to a centralized electronic ordering platform. Even though electronic ordering benefits everyone in the buying group’s supply chain, numerous road blocks seem to deter groups from moving forward.

Why Electronic Ordering?

Electronic ordering (or e-ordering), if done correctly, can provide buying groups with valuable purchasing data that can be used to strengthen the coop through:

·        Meaningful preferred vendor programs

·        Improved rebate negotiations

·        Knowledge of member performance and trends

·        Ability to forecast rebate earnings

·        Additional value-added shared services to members

·        Improved relationships with suppliers

E-Ordering Strategy

A successful e-ordering strategy includes:

·        adopting a flexible methodology that makes it easy for members with different capabilities to participate

·        providing carrots for both member and supplier participation

·        setting realistic adoption goals

·        committing to provide feedback to both members and suppliers on an on-going basis of the results of the program.

Flexible Methodology

It’s a fact of life of buying groups that when it comes to technology, members have their own comfort zones, capabilities, and preferred way of doing things. Unless your members are strongly motivated to adopt e-ordering, attempts to impose a single way of doing things will fail.

There are three broad forms of e-ordering:

·        A web-based ordering system where members manually key orders into an online catalogue

·        Capturing orders generated from members’ ERP systems

·        Converting other manual order mediums, such as emails, faxes, or spreadsheets, into an electronic (EDI) format

Each of these approaches have pros and cons, and no single approach will appeal to all of your members. However, by providing all of these options (or as many as possible), you will ensure that the maximum number of members participate. 

Online Catalogues

An online catalogue is simply a web-based tool for members to view the product available from a supplier and manually key in orders.

This approach requires the most effort from your group, your suppliers, and your members. As a purchasing cooperative, you will need to work with your suppliers to provide product information in a format you can publish into a web-catalogue. Ideally this product information will include product images, rich descriptions, and relevant cost information. Where possible, the task of putting this information together should be pushed to the suppliers themselves, but your purchasing cooperative should be prepared to step in where needed.

Members will have to be willing to visit the group’s web catalogue and manually key in orders. If they are accustomed to keying in orders into their supplier web sites, this will not be a difficult transition. However, if the member is used to generating purchase orders directly from their ERP systems, then convincing them to re-key their orders will be an uphill battle.

One advantage of managing online catalogues is that you will have a rich repository of product data that can be used in analytics as well as member e-commerce. The other advantage is that there are no costs for the member to participate.

Capturing Member Orders

A far less labour-intensive approach to e-ordering is to allow members to enter purchase orders into their existing ERP software, as they are already doing, and then provide a way to access those orders electronically.

The most common approach is to provide integrations into the various ERP systems used by your members. Such integrations result in either a file exported that can be transmitted and mapped as an EDI file, or a direct API integration into your ordering platform.

Some online catalogue providers also have the ability to accept “punch outs” from various systems. With a punch out, the member can view the catalogue and place orders while staying within their own software platforms. This style of e-ordering is most common with larger systems such as Oracle or J.D. Edwards.

The benefit of this approach is that it is built upon your members’ existing ordering process and eliminates any need for re-keying. The downside is that there is usually a cost involved for the member to create the integration and on an ongoing basis for transmitting orders. Groups can help reduce these costs by funding ERP integrations on behalf of their members and by negotiating a group rate for the EDI traffic.

Other Mediums

Depending on your provider, it is also possible to capture purchase orders in other formats and convert them into EDI files.

If your members regularly email or fax their orders, some providers have tools to capture those transmissions and convert the PDF attachment or fax into usable data that can be translated into an EDI file. This practice, unfortunately, tends to be less accurate than traditional EDI methods and may result in an increased number of failed orders.

Members may also create orders in Excel spreadsheets or other file formats. As long as the format is consistent from order to order, these files can be mapped into traditional EDI files. This process is highly accurate and provides a very reliable form of electronic ordering. The downside is there will likely be an additional cost to the member for translation maps.

Carrots

For an e-ordering initiative to be successful, it is important to have buy-in from your members and suppliers. The first step in achieving this buy-in is to communicate very clearly why you are adopting e-ordering and what the benefits are for everyone participating.

Carrots for Members

Members will benefit from added efficiencies, improved customer service, and increased cost savings.

The added efficiencies enjoyed by your members will vary based on how they are currently placing orders and how they will be sending e-orders. In environments where members have to visit each individual supplier’s web site, remember a username and password, and login to key in an order, having a single, group-sponsored online catalogue for every supplier will be very appealing to members.

Online catalogues also open up the opportunity for providing product information to members to fuel their POS, ERP, and e-commerce solutions. Product data is gold, and its value to members should not be underestimated.

In environments where orders can be created and transmitted directly from their ERP systems as part of their normal ordering process, maximum efficiency is gained. There is no re-keying as purchase orders are created automatically.

Members with the ability to already generate EDI orders from their ERP systems may have already launched their own e-ordering campaign. These efforts by individual members are generally time consuming and expensive, usually resulting in only a handful of suppliers being onboarded. A group-initiated e-ordering campaign eliminates these duplicated efforts among members, and result in a much higher level of supplier participation at far less cost and effort for each member.

Electronic ordering typically includes electronic acknowledgements and advance shipping notices. This will provide your members with timely information about out of stocks, back orders, product substitutions and shipping dates that can be vital when dealing with trade customers.

Finally, e-ordering can be used to negotiate increased rebates or discounts from your suppliers. E-ordering will save your suppliers money and will generally increase their sales. This can be used as a basis for negotiating additional rebates that can be passed along to your members. These rebates will sometimes cover any EDI costs the member may incur.

Carrots for Suppliers

Suppliers enjoy many cost savings and revenue generating opportunities when orders are placed electronically.

Electronic orders are fed directly into their ERP systems without the need for human processing. Their automatic processes are able to take the order, acknowledge it, fulfill it, and invoice it far more efficiently than if it arrived by other means.

Combining e-ordering with e-invoicing will provide further incentives for suppliers to participate. Studies show that e-invoicing greatly reduces the time to pay, putting money in your suppliers’ pockets sooner.

Offering a central billing program for some or all of your suppliers will also make them more eager to participate. If your group is paying invoices on behalf of your members, your suppliers will feel more confident of prompt payment. A single payer also streamlines their payment processes. With e-ordering and the right software tools, you will have visibility of what your members are ordering and be able to control any credit risks associated with central billing. The benefits of central billing to your suppliers will often cause them to provide you with better terms discounts which can introduce further savings for your members or generate revenue for your group.

Onboarding

Onboarding suppliers onto an electronic ordering platform is as much an art as it is a science. Treat it as you would any other major group initiative – talk about it in all your communications, measure it, and build a marketing initiative around it.

Tackle your low-hanging fruit first. Identify your suppliers who already support e-ordering and who are eager to participate. Early wins will help build confidence in the program and build momentum.

Next focus on your bigger suppliers, the ones with the greatest purchase volume from your group. They have the most to gain and will provide the biggest benefit to your members.

On the member-side, identify the most common ERP systems in use by your members and work to create integrations with them. Recruit members who will act as champions for your campaign and will be willing to talk with suppliers and other members.

If you will be creating online catalogues, make sure you have adequate staff in place. No matter how good your catalogue tools are, you will need staff to maintain products and catalogues on an on-going basis.

Set realistic goals and timelines for the number of suppliers and members participating in the program. It is unrealistic to expect 100% participation. Decide what numbers make sense for you.

Reporting

Once your e-ordering platform is up and running, continue to follow up on it. Continue to add suppliers to the platform. If possible, encourage your members to place orders for non-group suppliers as well so that you can capture data about those purchases.

Run reports every quarter, showing member purchases from suppliers and provide this feedback to your trading partners. Historically, purchases from suppliers who participate in e-ordering will increase over time. It is good practice to show this trend to your suppliers.

You can also use purchase data when evaluating your preferred vendor programs as well as tracking your members’ participation in your programs. Access to line item information may also help you when considering container buys or white label product lines.

Solution Providers

Moving to an e-ordering platform requires a knowledgeable partner who understands the uniqueness of the buying group model, has the appropriate software tools, and has experience building an EDI exchange within a supply chain.

Disrupt or be disrupted! Will the buying group/purchasing cooperative model face disruption?

I had a very interesting conversation with the leaders of a couple buying groups recently in Miami about whether the buying group/purchasing cooperative will last or whether it will be disrupted like Netflix disrupted the DVD rental business.

“Disruption”, as defined by Clayton M. Christensen, refers to a process where a smaller organization with fewer resources successfully challenges an incumbent business.

Here’s the way disruption works:

As an existing business focuses on improving their products and services for their most demanding and most profitable customers, they ignore the needs of other customers. Disruptors successfully target those overlooked customers, delivering more-suitable functionality often at a lower price. They do this partly by harnessing new technologies but also by developing new business models and exploiting old technologies in new ways. The incumbent business, which has institutionalized focusing on their more-demanding segments, does not respond fast or strong enough to the new competitors. These disruptors then move upmarket, delivering the benefits that incumbent’s mainstream customers need/want, while preserving the advantages that drove their early success. When the mainstream customers begin to adopt the entrants’ offerings in volume, disruption has occurred.

What could possibly disrupt buying groups? During our wine-fueled discussion, we came up with the following:

  • Will a nimbler buying group more adept at technology enter your space? 
  • Could online ordering portals allow independents to aggregate their purchasing power outside of the group?
  • Will Amazon’s continued growth disrupt the supply chain in a way that affects groups?
  • Will third party supply chain finance organizations provide new ways to fund purchases?
  • What effect will the rise of 3D printing have on your preferred vendors?

OK, someone always mentions 3D printing in every discussion about disruption. Most likely, if disruption comes, it will come from an unexpected direction.

So what can a buying group do to prevent disruption?

First, groups need to watch for and be aware of potential disruptors. It is important to have someone in your organization constantly asking what your competitors are doing and what you can do to either stave off or embrace disruption.

You also need to watch for potential disruptors to the business of your members.

It is worth noting that you should choose carefully what you view as disruptive. This shouldn’t become a “sky is falling” scenario. Develop a keen understanding of competitive offerings and know when a new model can offer more to your members in a different way than you currently do. Avoid an excess of attachment to today’s measure of success, and avoid the common technology trap of being attracted to the next shiny object.

If you do determine that a potential disruptor is entering your space, you should focus on focusing on the needs of smaller members. Remember that disruption starts with smaller, less-demanding customers (or in this case, members). Because your offerings are not as well-suited to the needs of smaller, less committed members, the door is open for disruptors to focus on providing them with a “good enough” service.

The good news is that disruption is creative and not just destructive. By devoting people and energy towards the growth opportunities that accompany disruption, your group may become stronger than ever.

Can You Afford Free Software?

Purchasing Cooperatives

Purchasing cooperatives are masters at piecing together a hodge-podge of free software tools to help them do their jobs. Need to do a mass mailing? Use Mailchimp. Need to collaborate across different home offices? There’s Google Docs. Need to make a conference call? Use UberConference.
SurveyMonkey, Doodle, HootSuite, Trello, Prezi… There’s lots of great free software out there. For buying groups with a limited operational budget and a high need to simply get the job done, these tools seem like a life saver.

But as a purchasing cooperative you have a unique responsibility when it comes to recommending free software to your members.

Nothing is Free

We all know that there is no such thing as “free as a business model”. So how do the creators of free software hope to make their money? Well, there are two models driving free software.

Advertising as a Business Model

The first model is “advertising as a business model”. By this, I don’t mean displaying ads on the page in hopes that you’ll click them. The return rate on this type of advertising is so small (fractions of a penny per click) that the site has to be as popular as Facebook or YouTube to be profitable.

By advertising as a business model, I mean the creator of the software is offering free use of the software in hopes that you will buy something else. That something else may be a paid version of the software with increased functionality, or it may be a completely different service or product.

On its own, as long as everyone is honest and up-front, this model is relatively benign. The downsides for you as a buying group include:

  • The software may not include all the functionality you need.
  • There’s no support for the software if you have questions or problems.
  • Because the software is a marketing device and not an end-product, it may not be updated with new features as often as you would like, and it becomes stagnant over time.
  • If the company is not successful with its primary line of revenue, the software may disappear or may be converted into pay-per-use.

Surveillance as a Business Model

The second model is “surveillance as a business model”. In this model, the creator of the software reserves the right to sell any private information it gains from you for commercial purposes.

In our personal lives, we’ve all grown accustomed to giving away private data. But as a purchasing cooperative the data you are giving away doesn’t belong to you.

It belongs to your members.

Whenever you use free software in your purchasing cooperative, you need to ask yourself whether you are giving away information that your members consider private. Are you putting your members’ sales, order, or customer data in someone else’s hands? It is hard enough to be an independent business these days without having the details of your business sold to your competitors.

The challenge is that there is no way of truly knowing if the company providing your free software is selling your information. Most terms of agreements contain vague clauses that would allow your data to be sold. Terms of agreements and licenses also change over time, often without you knowing it. Even if the founders of a company are adamant that they will not sell your data, the third party investors that fund the company may have other plans.

And remember, the two business models are not exclusive. In most cases, both are being used. And if they aren’t now, they will be in the future.

When is it OK to use Free Software?

I still use free software at work, with the following guidelines. I only use free software if:

  • It is not mission critical. Any task that is truly important to my company’s success is paid for.
  • It doesn’t involve sensitive data. That survey I send out once a year? I’d be fine if that information got out. My new product specifications? I’ll keep those off of Google Docs, thank you.
  • It’s not a task I do every day. I edit sound files a couple times a year for marketing projects. Audacity works great for that. I’m work with spreadsheets every day – I’m going to pay for Excel.
  • It’s not something that I will need help doing. LinkedIn is pretty simple. I’m not going to have to phone someone for help.

Most importantly, I’m not going to rely on free software for anything that may affect my customers. At that point, free would be too expensive.

Are Purchasing Cooperatives Still Relevant?

Technology can be a game changer.

 Technology is making it easier and easier for independents to connect with distributors in ways that drive down costs for each party, which in turn increases margins. For example, more and more web sites are appearing that are designed to facilitate B2B ordering. Sites like www.stockinthechannel.com, which claims to be the largest search engine for IT re-sellers, manufacturers and distributors, hope to transform the supply chain by making it possible for all independents to buy their product in one location, without having to belong to a buying group or purchasing cooperative.

 If technology exists to facilitate B2B ordering at lower prices, are traditional purchasing cooperatives still relevant? Why pay to join a coop if you can simply go to a site and do all of your ordering at comparable margins?

 There are quite a few reasons, actually. It is worth noting that B2B sites typically do not understand the nuances of the independent buying model. I’ve seen a lot of tech outsiders come in, trying to adapt a corporate B2B model to the independent model, and it never works.

The Drawbacks 

The biggest mistake is focusing on cost rather than on a model that includes rebates. They don’t understand that vendors are reluctant to lower costs because that tends to lower the street price of their product. Think about it. A large independent is competing against big boxes, often on price. It would be very tempting to take advantage of a lower cost to reduce their list price to beat their competition. Their competitors would respond by negotiating a similar cost reduction and lowering their own prices. If this happens on a large enough scale, the reduced price becomes the permanent street price. This example is simplistic, but illustrative.  

 That’s why vendors prefer to offer after-the-fact rebates. They can pay a monthly, quarterly, or annual payment based on the purchases of the re-seller. It is often difficult to trace this lump rebate back to specific products, making it difficult to assign cost and adjust street prices.

 In addition to protecting their street prices, rebates have the advantage of being based on actual purchases. Negotiations around cost are based on what the re-seller thinks they will buy; rebates are based on what they actually bought.

 Because of this last point, a higher upfront cost combined with a strong after-the-fact rebate will result in better overall margins from vendors.

 The B2B sites don’t get this fact, probably because they view the ordering process as a technical problem to solve. They haven’t invested the time to understand the commercial ecosystem they are trying to market to.

 This lack of understanding of the world of independents manifests itself in other ways as well. Most of these technology companies have visions of corporate sales which do not apply to independents. Independents are often reluctant to change their procedures and suspicious to new technology, even when offered free. Many of the hardware stores I sold POS systems to in Canada did not even have high-speed internet. And while they may belong to a group, the group can’t make a sales decision for them.

The sales cycle for new technology is one lengthy sale after another, a fact that tech companies don’t appreciate until it’s too late. I’ve seen far too many tech companies leave the independent B2B market because of this slow sales cycle.

 So the purchasing cooperative model still has a viable place despite the rise of B2B technology companies looking to work directly with independents. But it is vital that coops establish themselves in the minds of their members and vendors and clearly demonstrate the value they add when it comes to technology.

What can groups do? 

How can they do this?

 Buying groups and purchasing cooperatives need to recognize they must do more than just negotiate prices on goods sold. They must add value through marketing programs, administrative functions, product education, group benefits packages, HR tools, and a host of other functions.

 As part of their offering to members, groups need a robust technology offering for their members. The people who run buying groups should keep up with industry trends and mentor their members about how technology can be used in their businesses. They should be involved enough to help members make the right tech choices, while making sure those choices strengthen the group rather than weaken it. Groups should also use their buying power to negotiate better pricing and rebates for the technology purchased by their members.

 Most importantly, groups need to invest in their own technology to compete with these start ups. Technology that is relevant to the robust ecosystem of independent businesses, an ecosystem where buying groups are still very relevant.

“We have no pull with our vendors”

Our Vendors Don’t Listen to Us

One of the most common comments I hear from buying groups is “our vendors don’t listen to us”. Variations include “they will listen to our members but not to us”, “our vendors wouldn’t change that for us”, and “our suppliers barely know we exist”.

Almost universally, buying groups have a pessimistic view of how important they are to the vendors that service the group. It doesn’t seem to matter whether it’s a central bill group (where the group pays all invoices on behalf of their members) or a direct bill group (where members pay vendors themselves), the belief exists that the buying group itself has no influence with vendors.

What Do Vendors Think?

Because of this complaint, I’ve been thinking about the supply chain from the vendor’s point of view.

What do vendors think about buying groups?

What value can buying groups provide suppliers?

How can a buying group gain more influence over their suppliers?

Would unilaterally focusing on what your group can do for your vendors cause vendors to look at what they can do for the group?

With these thoughts in mind, I recently had dinner with the VP of Sales of a large national vendor that supplied product to 8 different buying groups.  When I asked him what buying groups can do to help him as a supplier, he brought up four areas.

  1. “Treat your preferred vendors better than the non-preferred vendors”: Preferred vendors have demonstrated their support to your Group through group-negotiated pricing and rebates, by participating in your shows, and helping out with other promotions as needed. In exchange for this, are you doing everything you can to make sure your members are buying from your preferred vendors?

Buying outside of the group is bad for everyone, but it is particularly hard on a loyal vendor who has put money on the line in to gain preferred status. Getting just one more member to start buying from a preferred vendor can make a big difference.

Likewise, don’t offer benefits to non-preferred vendors that should only be given to preferred vendors.

  1. “Make sure your buying shows consistently benefit your vendors”: Shows and conferences can be expensive for vendors to attend. In addition to the fees, there are travel costs, which are even higher if they have to bring product to display.

Are your suppliers getting enough orders at these events to justify their participation?

Don’t assume that if you haven’t heard any complaints, that your suppliers are happy. They are reluctant to offer criticism, no matter how constructive. Ask them very straightforward questions: Is it worthwhile for you to attend our events? Are you connecting with the right people? Would you prefer national events or regional events? How does our event compare to other events that you attend? Is there a different format that would be better?

  1. “Simplify the rebate process”: Suppliers have to provide groups with after-the-fact reporting on member purchases in order to calculate rebates. This is typically a very manual, time consuming process. Finding ways to streamline this process will help make it easier for the supplier to do business with you.

Improving the rebate reporting process may also allow vendors to offer more creative (that is, more beneficial) rebate programs. A supplier views rebate programs as an incentive program to get customers to buy the products the supplier most wants to sell. There are some types of product that suppliers want to sell more than others.

For example, think about a high-margin product or part that needs to be replenished regularly. Suppliers would gladly provide higher rebates for these types of items if they could clearly see the group’s total historical purchases and if doing so did not create additional administrative hassles for the supplier. I’ve seen this occur within the buying groups that use our rebate management software so I know it works. Rebates don’t have to be the same amount across all product lines.

  1. “Give us data on your members’ purchases from us”: The structure of a buying group with independent members usually does not fit nicely with vendors’ reporting tools. They can eventually pull data on what your members are spending with them, but they would love it if you made their job easier for them. If vendors had clear numbers about the Group’s total purchases from them, they would be better able to see the value of working with the Group and will be better able to run Group-specific promotions. Put systems in place to get this data, and make it your job to let your vendors know exactly what your members are buying from them.

Spend some time thinking about your vendors from their perspective. Figure out what is important to them and how your group can help them. Be a better business partner with your preferred vendors, and you will find that they start to reciprocate. You may find that you have a lot more pull with your vendors than you might think.

Page 2 of 3

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén